🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers introduced a new game mode titled Casual Breakthrough. To put it simply, this mode mirrors the regular Breakthrough format but features a few key adjustments:

• Every squad includes just eight human participants, with the rest made up of AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions performed by real players grant full XP, while AI activities offer reduced XP.
• Just a pair of locations can be played: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Features like Dogtags, accolades, and stat tracking have been turned off.

In short, this mode lives up to its title: it's a casual take of Breakthrough. On the surface, one could assume it's a good idea, as it gives additional choices for players looking for alternative methods to enjoy the game. However, if video games has shown one thing, it is that you can't please everyone. Which is to say, many BF6 fans are upset.

Player Reactions: Anger to Support

"People want real players. Don't repeat the mistakes of your rivals," reads a response to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing concept," comments another. At the same time, in community forums, a player notes, "It's unclear where we are headed with this game," while another lists all the issues they consider to be broken in Battlefield 6: "Resolve glitches, fix drone glitch, fix IVF rockets, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, amid the criticism, there are players explaining how much they're liking the recent addition. "It's enjoyable to practice, human participants prevent it from being a complete grind but it's quite laid-back," reads a forum post. "This subreddit fails to see that there are players who have lives and can't play this title all the time. Allow them to strike a balance," states a different comment. One reply via social media explains that as they're "a battledad with busy schedules, this is great for me," while another applauds the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Constructive Criticisms and Community Feedback

Despite the support, there are constructive reasons to complain about Casual Breakthrough. Some users have highlighted that it will make queue times even longer for other modes because of the sheer number of options currently available. Similarly, some areas often face AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. It also seems a little backwards that the mode won't start without a minimum number of human gamers, despite it primarily centers on fighting AI opponents.

Finally, one of the biggest grievances is that a previous feature was meant to provide complete rewards, even against bots, but that was removed when they tried to remove XP farming from the mode. So this new playlist feels like the community compromising halfway, according to forum feedback. Another labels this mode as the developers "dropping the ball significantly, I had great enjoyment in the first couple of days, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Future Prospects: Will Changes Be Made?

If the development team has demonstrated something so far with the latest installment, it is that they're listening and acting on feedback. Assignments being too difficult got fixed rapidly, as did the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, if their data shows this recent mode is underperforming to their standards, they will not hesitate to make further modifications.